As mentioned in the previous
article dated December 2, 2016, the concept of human rights fits only in
democracy. Democracy is the best locus where human rights are recognized, exercised and respected by the
authority. Authoritarian governments will
most likely neglect most of human rights of every member of the society. To its extreme, these governments may even
take the most fundamental rights of man like the right to life and the right to
live.
Many philosophers theorize the
nature and some aspects of democracy. Etymologically,
democracy means the “rule of the people,” which is derived from two Greek
words: demos meaning people and kratos meaning rule. Aristotle, ancient Greek philosopher,
classified three forms of governments, namely: monarchy, aristocracy and
democracy. By definition, monarchy means
a government ruled by one person, the monarch; aristocracy means a government
ruled by few, like the aristocrats; and democracy means a government ruled by
many or the people. Yet these governments
can become perverted, for example monarchy will turn into totalitarian, aristocracy
to oligarchy, or a democracy to a “mob rule.”
With each government’s twists and turns, we can infer that there is no
such thing as perfect government.
In this 21st century,
democracy becomes prevalent in many countries of the world. This is somehow the outcome of World War II fought between democratic and
totalitarian fronts or countries. This continued during the Cold
War between two ideologies and economic powers: communism (adapted in Russia) versus democracy
(adapted in the US). After all these
wars, democracy prevails and communism suffers from its gradual downfall. In history, we’ve seen a clearer picture how human
rights are observed under the two different ideologies. In totalitarian governments like communist
countries, human rights are denied. One
concrete manifestation of it is the exclusion of the Bill of Rights in the
constitution of the country. But mostly
communist countries don’t have a constitution.
In democratic countries like the US, inclusion of the Bill of Rights in
its constitution is a clear manifestation that US government recognized the
importance of human rights. My account here of the world history is "roughly said" but it's undeniably true that democracy promotes the respect of human rights.
In democracy, one’s freedom is
given importance. Democracy provides a space –be it physical or social, for
personal growth and development in different areas of life like professional, social, religious and
even political. By physical space, I mean
the immediate environment where we live in.
By social space, I mean the social environment we belong. In democracy, this space is freer to practice
our profession and for us to grow in our profession.
With this space, social mobility is prevalent. This space is very much freer for
us to choose and practice our religious belief. With this space, anyone can engage in political
life without any prejudice of social class we belong. It is only in democratic space where
we have opportunities for self-growth in all aspects of life.
In this context, we understand
how the concept of human rights is defined to its fullest sense. Human rights include all our rights, namely: natural such as the right to life and the right to live and conventional, which includes constitutional, statutory, economic, political, etc.
Government
shall protect all forms of human rights.
The inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the constitution of any state is
the best expression of respect and advocacy of human rights. Bill of Rights safeguards the rights of every
individual from any form of abuses inflicted by other individual, government,
or other institution. It is also
necessary for any government to define and redefine human rights in the
formulations of statutes or laws because each right is vulnerable to any form
of abuses.